Discussion:
A New Day for the Morning-After Pill
(too old to reply)
james g. keegan jr.
2009-03-30 20:15:12 UTC
Permalink
A New Day for the Morning-After Pill

A federal court ruling rightly criticizes the FDA's reasons for
limiting sales of the Plan B pill and orders a remedy.

The 40 studies were thorough and conclusive: The morning-after
contraceptive pill is safe and effective, and teenage girls understand
just as much as young women do about how to use it safely. Also well
studied were the Bush administration's attempts to keep the pill out of
the hands of American women and girls, at least for as long as it could.
The conclusion, just as clear, in a 2005 report by the Government
Accountability Office: The Food and Drug Administration abdicated its
duty, overriding and overruling scientists so that it could delay and
limit access to the pill and thus allay the concerns of religious
conservatives.

A federal court ruling this week spared no criticism of the FDA,
saying that the agency's reason for limiting behind-the-counter sales of
the pill to women 18 or older and to minors with a prescription "lacks
all credibility" and was politically motivated. Perhaps most scathing
was the court's order to the FDA: Go back and reexamine the issue solely
on its scientific merits. Within 30 days, the FDA also must make the
pill available to 17-year-olds without a prescription.

The FDA stalled for years with subterfuges that were all too
transparent. First it rejected nonprescription use of the pill, which
was marketed as Plan B. Then it told the manufacturer, Barr
Laboratories, to submit a proposal for allowing the pill for older teens
and adults. Once the company did so, the FDA said it wasn't sure that
limiting use by age was valid. Finally, in 2006, the agency decided to
give women 18 and older behind-the-counter access - but only as a sop to
senators who were threatening to hold up President Bush's nomination of
Andrew C. von Eschenbach as FDA commissioner.

The campaign to make Plan B available without a prescription was
based on solid medical grounds: The pill is most effective when used
within 24 hours of intercourse. The response of the FDA, which the
public relies on to make equally solid medical decisions, was an
embarrassing new low that prompted the agency's director of women's
health to resign. Objections that the pill would entice girls into
earlier and more promiscuous sex were not only unfounded - among the
studies were findings that access to Plan B did not affect sexual
behavior - but irrelevant. It was never part of the FDA's job to monitor
moral behavior among adolescents.

There is justified glee in the scientific community over the
announcement by President Obama that science will be shown due respect
under his administration. As welcome as this new direction is, the
court's review of the FDA's actions provides an even more significant
reassurance that the government will be held to account no matter who is
in power at the moment.

http://www.truthout.org/032709HA?print
--
"You have confirmed my suspicion that those who argue the rights
of the fetus view the woman as a container."
==Muriel Nelson <***@hemlock‚.cray.com>
J
2009-03-31 05:43:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by james g. keegan jr.
A New Day for the Morning-After Pill
A federal court ruling rightly criticizes the FDA's reasons for
limiting sales of the Plan B pill and orders a remedy.
The 40 studies were thorough and conclusive: The morning-after
contraceptive pill is safe and effective, and teenage girls understand
just as much as young women do about how to use it safely. Also well
studied were the Bush administration's attempts to keep the pill out of
the hands of American women and girls, at least for as long as it could.
The conclusion, just as clear, in a 2005 report by the Government
Accountability Office: The Food and Drug Administration abdicated its
duty, overriding and overruling scientists so that it could delay and
limit access to the pill and thus allay the concerns of religious
conservatives.
A federal court ruling this week spared no criticism of the FDA,
saying that the agency's reason for limiting behind-the-counter sales of
the pill to women 18 or older and to minors with a prescription "lacks
all credibility" and was politically motivated. Perhaps most scathing
was the court's order to the FDA: Go back and reexamine the issue solely
on its scientific merits. Within 30 days, the FDA also must make the
pill available to 17-year-olds without a prescription.
The FDA stalled for years with subterfuges that were all too
transparent. First it rejected nonprescription use of the pill, which
was marketed as Plan B. Then it told the manufacturer, Barr
Laboratories, to submit a proposal for allowing the pill for older teens
and adults. Once the company did so, the FDA said it wasn't sure that
limiting use by age was valid. Finally, in 2006, the agency decided to
give women 18 and older behind-the-counter access - but only as a sop to
senators who were threatening to hold up President Bush's nomination of
Andrew C. von Eschenbach as FDA commissioner.
The campaign to make Plan B available without a prescription was
based on solid medical grounds: The pill is most effective when used
within 24 hours of intercourse. The response of the FDA, which the
public relies on to make equally solid medical decisions, was an
embarrassing new low that prompted the agency's director of women's
health to resign. Objections that the pill would entice girls into
earlier and more promiscuous sex were not only unfounded - among the
studies were findings that access to Plan B did not affect sexual
behavior - but irrelevant. It was never part of the FDA's job to monitor
moral behavior among adolescents.
There is justified glee in the scientific community over the
announcement by President Obama that science will be shown due respect
under his administration. As welcome as this new direction is, the
court's review of the FDA's actions provides an even more significant
reassurance that the government will be held to account no matter who is
in power at the moment.
http://www.truthout.org/032709HA?print
--
The real issue is whether a minor is capable of making life and death
decisions concerning her baby. The answer is resoundly "No!"
--
J Young
***@live.com

**************************************


Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
From: "Loose Cannon" <***@juno.com>
Date: 2000/06/13
Subject: Re: A M u s t R e a d !

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.guns/msg/7ee3777630814ae0


A vote for Pat Buchannon is a vote for al gore. Look at how Perot handed
clinton a couple wins. Any other time I would consider looking at a 3rd
party candidate but not this year. Too much is at stake this year.
L.C.
Adam A. Wanderer
2009-04-02 17:39:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by J
Post by james g. keegan jr.
A New Day for the Morning-After Pill
The real issue is whether a minor is capable of making life and death
decisions concerning her baby. The answer is resoundly "No!"
Most women aren't, adult or minor, capable of making life and death
decisions about their babies. But, in the case of the Morning-After Pill,
it's just tissue, sort of like a hang nail, so any woman can decide, at any
age, without argument, debate, paternal consent or any advice from a
religious "institute".
Praise God in Heaven President Obama was elected!
Chris
2009-04-02 19:40:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam A. Wanderer
Post by J
Post by james g. keegan jr.
A New Day for the Morning-After Pill
The real issue is whether a minor is capable of making life and death
decisions concerning her baby. The answer is resoundly "No!"
Most women aren't, adult or minor, capable of making life and death
decisions about their babies. But, in the case of the Morning-After Pill,
it's just tissue, sort of like a hang nail, so any woman can decide, at
any age, without argument, debate, paternal consent or any advice from a
religious "institute".
Praise God in Heaven President Obama was elected!
Absolutely, because he is going to solve ALL the problems for the liberals!
Especially since they are in control of the government.......
james g. keegan jr.
2009-04-03 02:46:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by J
Post by james g. keegan jr.
A New Day for the Morning-After Pill
A federal court ruling rightly criticizes the FDA's reasons for
limiting sales of the Plan B pill and orders a remedy.
The 40 studies were thorough and conclusive: The morning-after
contraceptive pill is safe and effective, and teenage girls understand
just as much as young women do about how to use it safely. Also well
studied were the Bush administration's attempts to keep the pill out of
the hands of American women and girls, at least for as long as it could.
The conclusion, just as clear, in a 2005 report by the Government
Accountability Office: The Food and Drug Administration abdicated its
duty, overriding and overruling scientists so that it could delay and
limit access to the pill and thus allay the concerns of religious
conservatives.
A federal court ruling this week spared no criticism of the FDA,
saying that the agency's reason for limiting behind-the-counter sales of
the pill to women 18 or older and to minors with a prescription "lacks
all credibility" and was politically motivated. Perhaps most scathing
was the court's order to the FDA: Go back and reexamine the issue solely
on its scientific merits. Within 30 days, the FDA also must make the
pill available to 17-year-olds without a prescription.
The FDA stalled for years with subterfuges that were all too
transparent. First it rejected nonprescription use of the pill, which
was marketed as Plan B. Then it told the manufacturer, Barr
Laboratories, to submit a proposal for allowing the pill for older teens
and adults. Once the company did so, the FDA said it wasn't sure that
limiting use by age was valid. Finally, in 2006, the agency decided to
give women 18 and older behind-the-counter access - but only as a sop to
senators who were threatening to hold up President Bush's nomination of
Andrew C. von Eschenbach as FDA commissioner.
The campaign to make Plan B available without a prescription was
based on solid medical grounds: The pill is most effective when used
within 24 hours of intercourse. The response of the FDA, which the
public relies on to make equally solid medical decisions, was an
embarrassing new low that prompted the agency's director of women's
health to resign. Objections that the pill would entice girls into
earlier and more promiscuous sex were not only unfounded - among the
studies were findings that access to Plan B did not affect sexual
behavior - but irrelevant. It was never part of the FDA's job to monitor
moral behavior among adolescents.
There is justified glee in the scientific community over the
announcement by President Obama that science will be shown due respect
under his administration. As welcome as this new direction is, the
court's review of the FDA's actions provides an even more significant
reassurance that the government will be held to account no matter who is
in power at the moment.
http://www.truthout.org/032709HA?print
The real issue is whether a minor is capable of making life and death
decisions concerning her baby.
no it isn't, but i'm very pleased that the far right wackos can't come
up with anything better.
--
"You have confirmed my suspicion that those who argue the rights
of the fetus view the woman as a container."
==Muriel Nelson <***@hemlock‚.cray.com>
(¯`·.žCraig Chiltonž.·Ž¯) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
2009-04-06 21:30:38 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:43:54 -0400,
Post by J
Post by james g. keegan jr.
A New Day for the Morning-After Pill
A federal court ruling rightly criticizes the FDA's reasons for
limiting sales of the Plan B pill and orders a remedy.
The 40 studies were thorough and conclusive: The morning-after
contraceptive pill is safe and effective, and teenage girls understand
just as much as young women do about how to use it safely. Also well
studied were the Bush administration's attempts to keep the pill out of
the hands of American women and girls, at least for as long as it could.
The conclusion, just as clear, in a 2005 report by the Government
Accountability Office: The Food and Drug Administration abdicated its
duty, overriding and overruling scientists so that it could delay and
limit access to the pill and thus allay the concerns of religious
conservatives.
A federal court ruling this week spared no criticism of the FDA,
saying that the agency's reason for limiting behind-the-counter sales of
the pill to women 18 or older and to minors with a prescription "lacks
all credibility" and was politically motivated. Perhaps most scathing
was the court's order to the FDA: Go back and reexamine the issue solely
on its scientific merits. Within 30 days, the FDA also must make the
pill available to 17-year-olds without a prescription.
The FDA stalled for years with subterfuges that were all too
transparent. First it rejected nonprescription use of the pill, which
was marketed as Plan B. Then it told the manufacturer, Barr
Laboratories, to submit a proposal for allowing the pill for older teens
and adults. Once the company did so, the FDA said it wasn't sure that
limiting use by age was valid. Finally, in 2006, the agency decided to
give women 18 and older behind-the-counter access - but only as a sop to
senators who were threatening to hold up President Bush's nomination of
Andrew C. von Eschenbach as FDA commissioner.
The campaign to make Plan B available without a prescription was
based on solid medical grounds: The pill is most effective when used
within 24 hours of intercourse. The response of the FDA, which the
public relies on to make equally solid medical decisions, was an
embarrassing new low that prompted the agency's director of women's
health to resign. Objections that the pill would entice girls into
earlier and more promiscuous sex were not only unfounded - among the
studies were findings that access to Plan B did not affect sexual
behavior - but irrelevant. It was never part of the FDA's job to monitor
moral behavior among adolescents.
There is justified glee in the scientific community over the
announcement by President Obama that science will be shown due respect
under his administration. As welcome as this new direction is, the
court's review of the FDA's actions provides an even more significant
reassurance that the government will be held to account no matter who is
in power at the moment.
http://www.truthout.org/032709HA?print
The real issue is whether a minor is capable of making life and death
decisions concerning her baby.
Wrong!! Since there is NO **baby** involved prior to BIRTH.

Once again, "IBen," you have PROVEN your abject IGNORANCE.


-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <***@ymail.com>


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

There are Hypocritical RRR Cult Lemmings...
And there are INSANE & Hypocritical RRR Cult Lemmings.
_________________
| |
/| /| | I am "IBen." |
||__|| | One of Usenet's |
/ O O\ | MOST moronic |
/ \ | | schmucks! |
/ \ \ |______ __________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\__/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |__ _ -

"I had just got finished paying your mother $10 for that great
blowjob she's famous for at Union Square Park."
From: "J" <***@live.com>
Message-ID: <***@news.alt.net>

"America, with the exception of the jews and niggers, are not a
nation of pigs."
From: "J" <***@ass.com>
Message-ID: <***@news.alt.net>

"Fuck you, homo. ...The coward here is *you*, cunt"
Message-ID: <***@giganews.com>

"I currently have 17 different news servers on 'my favorites' list. Add to
this the fact that I can also open an account with Google under however many
e-mail addresses I can conjure...You will *never* be rid of me until I
decide I want to go."
From: "J Young" <***@aol.com>, hypocrite.
Message-ID: <4738a772$0$13174$***@news.newsdemon.com>

Why is "J" pretending to be a doctor?:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.israel/msg/8c3f0179ce991660?hl=en&dmode=source

"Please don't preach to me about the Bible. I don't quote it
nor do I make reference to it."
From: "J Young" <***@aol.com>
Message-ID: <WM-dnc77IZmEUUjeRVn-***@giganews.com>

"I ain't a Jesus freak... I love porn stars!"
From: ***@volcanomail.com (J Young)
Message-ID: <***@posting.google.com>

"I think lesbians are just fine.I ain't a Bible thumper I keep telling you."
Post by J
Once again, prosecutors are chasing down old men for their having the
misfortune to get caught up in the war when they were teenagers. Have
*some* compassion and leave him alone.
"LC" wrote:

You and your well-known Nazi sympathies are as transparent as your
sockpuppets, "Dr. Hellman":

"The only shame in the 60th anniversary commemoration at Auschwitz is
the blind eye and denial of the suffering and death the German
civilians and POW's who suffered their fate there"
From: "Auric Hellman" <***@volcanomail.com>
Newsgroups:
soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.german,alt.politics.usa,tx.politics,seattle.politics
Subject: Remember the Germans who died at Auschwitz
Date: 26 Jan 2005 21:36:28 -0800
Message-ID: <***@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

"That just 'burns' certain people that a swastika would be such a
popular Christmas item. Maybe there'll be some left for Passover ;-)"
From: Auric Hellman <***@volcanomail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.gossip.royalty, soc.culture.jewish, tx.politics,
soc.culture.israel
Subject: Finns Snap Up Swastika Rings for Christmas
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:
<0b02f568-9834-45df-a679-***@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>

<< With gratitude to "LC" for his compilations of these! >>

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Loading...